Poll: Are physical models still valuable as architectural tools?

In an age of virtual reality and 3D rendering software, are physical models still valuable tools for the architect? If you are an architect, does your firm still make physical models?

Post your answer here or visit the poll on our blog

Tags: architect, models, physical, tool

Views: 10

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Absolutely!
Building a model forces you to study and really learn the building. This is especially true when it comes to one of our favorite reasons for digital models: buildings of complex form. The computer allows you to make nearly anything look good. Only seeing the form in reality washes the lipstick off the pig.
Additional points:
If you can't build it at a small scale, you can't build it.
What works in concept doesn't always work in reality.
Scale matters. A lot.

That said, I also admit that I don't necessarily prioritize making a physical model of everything myself. If I am working on something that I know well and am very familiar or experienced with, I will often not make the physical model. I do always make a digital model though.

It can be truly tempting to work only in the digital and forgo building a model. It can also be embarrassing. I've had a table fail - I only made one simple study model and stopped the exploration there. Oops.

Actually, I'm going to re-prioritize it in my own work now. Thanks!

RSS

Follow

Photoblog

Loading

© 2013   Created by Rafael Marxuach.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service