the time causes that the architecture changes, gives him slides, wears away and a different perception seeing towards the past, is as a wine that improves with the years and changes its flavor with time.
time in relationship with Space will always be related to different factors .
for ex. if we 're in the out door stable in our places , then time would be felt in sun and light intensity and various angels of light on space.
if we fixed the factor of light , and started moving around or inside space , so in each and every second we will get a new result of space perception ...
you know what further ?? it's when space starts talking to you and by time your perception is totally different along the time ...
but , if we really could find a PROCESS TO INSERT TIME INFLUENCE IN SPACE DESIGN . ....
i think that would be great.
Since 1905 when Albert Eistein theoreized the " restricted theory of relativity " we rigorously should not speak any more about space & time as separate concepts. We have instead to try to conceive in Art and in Architecture both the possibility of a new concept : spacetime.
Who could be of help for us...it is philosphy of physics...philosophy of math...and finally aesthetics as philosophy of art . The question at this point to my eyes it could be : architecture is it always using for its pratics some geometric and math..forms ? If yes, it is necessary than to know first by which way Form ( ontologically understood ) concept is implied into architecture and art ...and later to know maybe its relations with spacetime concept.... ciao,
" . suddenly I realized that geometry possess physical meanings..." Albert Einstein -
Gravity -as still almost completely unknown fundamental force of universe - perfectly coincides with curvature of spacetime by theory of general relativity. Right !
Well. Better : the curvature of spacetime - is the gravity in itself !
But the curvature is also a form of geometry. It is a form of geometry on curve space that belongs for definition to a non-euclidean geometries. Well.
Question for art & architecture : who created these forms of many compact, axiomatic and finally not -contraddictory geometrical systems ?
Are these forms of geometry ( as math...objects of infinite geometries ) living into a immutable " platonic and hyper-uranic reality " - or insted they are totally created by man ? Only invented by man ?
A possible answer to this question could decide about infinite concepts of what art and architecture also could be...now and in the future... ciao, attilio
Mr. Attilio , your point is very interesting , i agree with you totally . you understand spacetime curve reality and relation with gravity perfectly, as we see gravity all the time controls forms of our architectural works.
But, about the forms of geometry , they are not man made works in my opinion . as Bernard Show sayed : ALL WHAT YOU IMAGINE IS REAL ,. they are really exist , somewhere we donnu where they exist at all . but we're about to talk about a philosophical point here that we're not alone in this universe ....
wit evry tik o a second
wit evry tik o a minute
wit evry tik o an hour
wit evry tik o a day
wit evry tik o a year
this planet/whol o space is subjected to modification either by natural o human means...
evry tik undergoes alterations which is termed as architecture.